This two-part manuscript presents a comprehensive methodology for the irregularity assessment of urban stone pavements. The proper road surface assessment using key performance indicators is necessary to plan appropriate maintenance strategies. However, there are no monitoring methods or evaluation criteria for stone pavements whose surfaces are more uneven than traditional ones due to their structural characteristics. Therefore, it is useful to define criteria for assessing irregularities considering the comfort experienced by road users and classify their conditions. This second part presents the geometric and comfort analyses of 40 urban branch profiles to describe pavement unevenness. In particular, four methods have been investigated: the International Roughness Index (IRI) according to ASTM E1926, the surface profile classification according to ISO 8608, the comfort index (awz) according to ISO 2631, and the straightedge analysis for stone pavements (SASP) proposed by the authors that is able to evaluate the effect of localized irregularities, taking into account different urban vehicles. In conclusion, four classes have been defined to describe geometric and comfort conditions that can support road manager decisions in order to implement an effective pavement management system.

Methods for Measuring and Assessing Irregularities of Stone Pavements — Part II / Cantisani, Giuseppe; Bruno, Salvatore; D'Andrea, Antonio; Loprencipe, Giuseppe; DI MASCIO, Paola; Moretti, Laura. - In: SUSTAINABILITY. - ISSN 2071-1050. - 15:4(2023). [10.3390/su15043715]

Methods for Measuring and Assessing Irregularities of Stone Pavements — Part II

Giuseppe Cantisani
;
Salvatore Bruno;Antonio D’Andrea;Giuseppe Loprencipe;Paola Di Mascio;Laura Moretti
2023

Abstract

This two-part manuscript presents a comprehensive methodology for the irregularity assessment of urban stone pavements. The proper road surface assessment using key performance indicators is necessary to plan appropriate maintenance strategies. However, there are no monitoring methods or evaluation criteria for stone pavements whose surfaces are more uneven than traditional ones due to their structural characteristics. Therefore, it is useful to define criteria for assessing irregularities considering the comfort experienced by road users and classify their conditions. This second part presents the geometric and comfort analyses of 40 urban branch profiles to describe pavement unevenness. In particular, four methods have been investigated: the International Roughness Index (IRI) according to ASTM E1926, the surface profile classification according to ISO 8608, the comfort index (awz) according to ISO 2631, and the straightedge analysis for stone pavements (SASP) proposed by the authors that is able to evaluate the effect of localized irregularities, taking into account different urban vehicles. In conclusion, four classes have been defined to describe geometric and comfort conditions that can support road manager decisions in order to implement an effective pavement management system.
2023
stone pavements; pavement roughness; assessment methods; urban road safety; vulnerable road users; user riding comfort
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Methods for Measuring and Assessing Irregularities of Stone Pavements — Part II / Cantisani, Giuseppe; Bruno, Salvatore; D'Andrea, Antonio; Loprencipe, Giuseppe; DI MASCIO, Paola; Moretti, Laura. - In: SUSTAINABILITY. - ISSN 2071-1050. - 15:4(2023). [10.3390/su15043715]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Cantisani_Methods-for-measuring_2023.pdf

accesso aperto

Note: articolo
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 3.2 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.2 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1671055
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact